Note: The online Request to Speak window has expired.
The online Comment window has expired
Agenda Item
39 Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-DV-2-19-2 - Northeast Corner of Central Avenue and Happy Valley Road (Resolution 21857)
I am a resident of the adjacent community Union Foothills, and live less than a half mile from the proposed development. I object to the rezoning of the Happy Valley and Central Roads area, as it changes the dynamic of the existing neighborhood that's been established to adhere to the less dense zoning for that area. Allowing a variance to increase the density will injure the residents (like myself) of the area who've built here specifically for the uniquely rural zoning requirements.
Please do not approve this project. This project in it's current form does not fit with this area at all, nor has due diligence been exercised for density, traffic, and drainage. We all welcome new neighbors, but this development is not well thought out, nor does it fit with the current community to the north, that it will greatly affect.
Please don't approve this as submitted. I own property just an acre north of the proposed development. The density is way too high and not compatible with the surrounding houses. There needs to be lower density zoning and/or a large buffer instead of just slapping it next to one home per acre properties.
I am requesting that the City Council not approve this development as submitted as a member of the Central Foothills Concerned Citizens (CFCC). The CFCC community has proposed a compatible land-use development plan that is a true compromise, and satisfies the Planning Department’s staff recommendation for Parcel One (1) to be zoned with R1-18/R1-10 density, which has been presented to the Applicant/Developer.As a homeowner on East Yearling Rd, I strongly oppose this development as submitted.
I as a member of the Central Foothills Concerned Citizens (CFCC), request that the City Council not approve this development as submitted. This proposed development has been and is incompatible land use with the area, and is the very description of speculative spot zoning. The CFCC community has proposed a compatible land-use development plan that is a true compromise, and satisfies the Planning Department’s staff recommendation for Parcel One (1) to be zoned with R1-18/R1-10 density.
The Developer has completed a preliminary Drainage Report on Friday August 29th. That report by CVL states on Page 1 "combined peak flow of 640 cubic feet per second impacting the Central Foothills development." On Page 2"The local streets will be designed such that 100- year flows do not exceed 100 cubic feet per second per CoP Storm Water Policies." Please continue or oppose this request until the layout of new homes on the hillside slopes has been done completely, addressing the water flows.
I am a resident of the adjacent community Union Foothills, and live less than a half mile from the proposed development. I object to the rezoning of the Happy Valley and Central Roads area, as it changes the dynamic of the existing neighborhood that's been established to adhere to the less dense zoning for that area. Allowing a variance to increase the density will injure the residents (like myself) of the area who've built here specifically for the uniquely rural zoning requirements.
I'm a member of the Deer Valley Village and we approved this case 11-1. I'm in full support of this case.
I’m part of the village that approved this case 11/1 and the commission approved this case 6/1, please approved this case. Thank you
Please do not approve this project. This project in it's current form does not fit with this area at all, nor has due diligence been exercised for density, traffic, and drainage. We all welcome new neighbors, but this development is not well thought out, nor does it fit with the current community to the north, that it will greatly affect.
Please don't approve this as submitted. I own property just an acre north of the proposed development. The density is way too high and not compatible with the surrounding houses. There needs to be lower density zoning and/or a large buffer instead of just slapping it next to one home per acre properties.
Please apply my speaking time to Heather Lennon
I am requesting that the City Council not approve this development as submitted as a member of the Central Foothills Concerned Citizens (CFCC). The CFCC community has proposed a compatible land-use development plan that is a true compromise, and satisfies the Planning Department’s staff recommendation for Parcel One (1) to be zoned with R1-18/R1-10 density, which has been presented to the Applicant/Developer.As a homeowner on East Yearling Rd, I strongly oppose this development as submitted.
I as a member of the Central Foothills Concerned Citizens (CFCC), request that the City Council not approve this development as submitted. This proposed development has been and is incompatible land use with the area, and is the very description of speculative spot zoning. The CFCC community has proposed a compatible land-use development plan that is a true compromise, and satisfies the Planning Department’s staff recommendation for Parcel One (1) to be zoned with R1-18/R1-10 density.
The Developer has completed a preliminary Drainage Report on Friday August 29th. That report by CVL states on Page 1 "combined peak flow of 640 cubic feet per second impacting the Central Foothills development." On Page 2"The local streets will be designed such that 100- year flows do not exceed 100 cubic feet per second per CoP Storm Water Policies." Please continue or oppose this request until the layout of new homes on the hillside slopes has been done completely, addressing the water flows.
I want to request a continuance of 30 days so discussions between the applicant and local residents can continue toward more agreement.