38 Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona State University and its Rob and Melani Walton Sustainability Solutions Services for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (Ordinance S-50306)
Do we really need to dump state money into ASU for a greenhouse gas study when there are multiple degree programs that have already shown their bias to eliminating meat and dairy products all in the name of meeting the Net-Zero emissions by 2050. Many states are moving away from the Greenhouse Gas Pact as they realize the draconian measures and financial burdens the Green Energy agenda is placing on the typical US family. Let ASU do the study for free or solicit money from their private donors.
In 2022, the state of Arizona gave ASU $356.8 million. ASU is obviously biased, and should look into permaculture as a solution instead of being so dedicated to eliminating dairy and meat products.
ASU has showed a bias in these areas and is not a legitimate choice for this study. Further, why is the city even involved in spending so much money on this type of study? Other sources will do this research.
In 2022, the state of Arizona gave ASU $356.8 million. ASU should do this for free. Furthermore, ASU has multiple degree programs dedicated to eliminating dairy and meat products in the name of reducing global warming. ASU is biased when conducting these types of evaluations.
In 2022, the state of Arizona gave ASU $356.8 million. ASU should do this for free. Furthermore, ASU has multiple degree programs dedicated to eliminating dairy and meat products in the name of reducing global warming. ASU is biased when conducting these types of evaluations.
In 2022, the state of Arizona gave ASU $356.8 million. ASU should do this for free. Furthermore, ASU has multiple degree programs dedicated to eliminating dairy and meat products in the name of reducing global warming. ASU is biased when conducting these types of evaluations.
Do we really need to dump state money into ASU for a greenhouse gas study when there are multiple degree programs that have already shown their bias to eliminating meat and dairy products all in the name of meeting the Net-Zero emissions by 2050. Many states are moving away from the Greenhouse Gas Pact as they realize the draconian measures and financial burdens the Green Energy agenda is placing on the typical US family. Let ASU do the study for free or solicit money from their private donors.
In 2022, the state of Arizona gave ASU $356.8 million. ASU is obviously biased, and should look into permaculture as a solution instead of being so dedicated to eliminating dairy and meat products.
ASU has showed a bias in these areas and is not a legitimate choice for this study. Further, why is the city even involved in spending so much money on this type of study? Other sources will do this research.
In 2022, the state of Arizona gave ASU $356.8 million. ASU should do this for free. Furthermore, ASU has multiple degree programs dedicated to eliminating dairy and meat products in the name of reducing global warming. ASU is biased when conducting these types of evaluations.
In 2022, the state of Arizona gave ASU $356.8 million. ASU should do this for free. Furthermore, ASU has multiple degree programs dedicated to eliminating dairy and meat products in the name of reducing global warming. ASU is biased when conducting these types of evaluations.
In 2022, the state of Arizona gave ASU $356.8 million. ASU should do this for free. Furthermore, ASU has multiple degree programs dedicated to eliminating dairy and meat products in the name of reducing global warming. ASU is biased when conducting these types of evaluations.