47 Amend Phoenix City Code to Include Peer-to-Peer Car Sharing and the Commercial Use Permit Requirements at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Ordinance G-7221)
This policy is inequitable for folks trying to get by and provide ride share services to Sky Harbor Airport. It negatively impacts the poor because it adds another tax on ride sharing. If the driver can afford to pay the tax, then it will be passed down to the customer who will then wind up pay even more for the service. This is another example of the city pushing corrupt policies that benefit a different set of companies than the ones negatively impacted.
This policy is inequitable for folks trying to get by and provide ride share services to Sky Harbor Airport. It negatively impacts the poor because it adds another tax on ride sharing. If the driver can afford to pay the tax, then it will be passed down to the customer who will then wind up pay even more for the service. This is another example of the city pushing corrupt policies that benefit a different set of companies than the ones negatively impacted.
This amendment is a tax on ride sharing services, and the tax is eventually passed down to the customer. We do not need more taxes!
John and Mathis need to leave their problems at the Day Center lunch table, please!
Thank you!
This policy is inequitable for folks trying to get by and provide ride share services to Sky Harbor Airport. It negatively impacts the poor because it adds another tax on ride sharing. If the driver can afford to pay the tax, then it will be passed down to the customer who will then wind up pay even more for the service. This is another example of the city pushing corrupt policies that benefit a different set of companies than the ones negatively impacted.
This policy is inequitable for folks trying to get by and provide ride share services to Sky Harbor Airport. It negatively impacts the poor because it adds another tax on ride sharing. If the driver can afford to pay the tax, then it will be passed down to the customer who will then wind up pay even more for the service. This is another example of the city pushing corrupt policies that benefit a different set of companies than the ones negatively impacted.