*100 ***REQUEST TO WITHDRAW (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 15, NOVEMBER 5 AND DECEMBER 3, 2025) - Public Hearing and Modification of Stipulation Request - Rezoning Application PHO-1-25--Z-323-79-6 - Northwest Corner of 24th Street and Missouri Avenue - District 6
The original stipulations on 5500 Missouri should be strictly enforced without modification. The property owner has acted in bad faith towards the neighborhood & to modify the stipulations would only reward bad behavior & let others know that acting in bad faith will be rewarded. An exception was already made for 5500 Missouri - no further exception can be granted without harm to all the residents of the neighborhood.
This property was allowed to operate w/i a residential neighborhood only because VERY specific zoning limits were imposed. The limits weren't optional & were the reason neighbors accepted a non-residential use at this location. Approving weakens long-standing commitments & suggest zoning protections can be revisited after construction activity occurs. Zoning only works if it is applied consistently & predictably. I respectfully ask the City Council to uphold the stipulations & deny this request
The stipulations of 1980 are very well thought out and protect our community from encroachment of other commercial properties. Those stipulations allowed a very quiet c-o type business to coexist with the neighborhood. We need to keep with the one story neighborhood.
I oppose PHO-1-25--Z-323-79-6. The original zoning approval for this property was granted
only because of strict, site-specific commitments, including a one-story limit and enhanced
parking requirements to protect nearby homes. Those commitments were not optional.
Approving this request would undermine the trust neighbors placed in the City when those
conditions were adopted.
The original stipulations on 5500 Missouri should be strictly enforced without modification. The property owner has acted in bad faith towards the neighborhood & to modify the stipulations would only reward bad behavior & let others know that acting in bad faith will be rewarded. An exception was already made for 5500 Missouri - no further exception can be granted without harm to all the residents of the neighborhood.
This property was allowed to operate w/i a residential neighborhood only because VERY specific zoning limits were imposed. The limits weren't optional & were the reason neighbors accepted a non-residential use at this location. Approving weakens long-standing commitments & suggest zoning protections can be revisited after construction activity occurs. Zoning only works if it is applied consistently & predictably. I respectfully ask the City Council to uphold the stipulations & deny this request
The stipulations of 1980 are very well thought out and protect our community from encroachment of other commercial properties. Those stipulations allowed a very quiet c-o type business to coexist with the neighborhood. We need to keep with the one story neighborhood.
Marilyn Ticknor
I oppose PHO-1-25--Z-323-79-6. The original zoning approval for this property was granted
only because of strict, site-specific commitments, including a one-story limit and enhanced
parking requirements to protect nearby homes. Those commitments were not optional.
Approving this request would undermine the trust neighbors placed in the City when those
conditions were adopted.
We all are expected to abide by rules and zoning regulations. The current Owner has not done so.
Gregory Groh 2115 E Montebello Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85016
I still stand by my previous comments and opposition in the past. Neighborhoods are the true life of the City. Please don't compromise them.
I still stand by with previous comments and opposition submitted in the past.