Take Agenda Item 2 off the consent agenda and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law.
This agenda Item should not be on the consent agenda since it is lacking a study that is not included on the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. This agenda item should be removed and/or voted NO on.
The study this agenda item references is missing from the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law as our council should be provided all information to vote and that we the people are able to discern the information to determine if this is good for us the taxpayers.
Remove this item from the agenda and cast a 'no' vote. The Phoenix team say there's supporting study for proposed speed limit reductions, but this study is absent from the agenda documentation, constituting a breach of open meeting regulations. Item 2 exhibits a lack of fairness as it disproportionately affects the most disadvantaged communities. Those in less fortunate circumstances will face financial burdens due to the inevitable fines associated with lowered speed limits.
Table this item. Maricopa County just voted in their last public meeting to increase speed limits. When you originally proposed Vision Zero, you promised it would not be used to reduce speed limits. In fact, you mocked those who said reducing speed limits would happen from this failed program. Reducing speed limits increases traffic congestion and carbon emissions from the idling of cars.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits
Remove this item from the agenda and cast a 'no' vote. The Phoenix team say there's supporting study for proposed speed limit reductions, but this study is absent from the agenda documentation, constituting a breach of open meeting regulations. Item 2 exhibits a lack of fairness as it disproportionately affects the most disadvantaged communities. Those in less fortunate circumstances will face financial burdens due to the inevitable fines associated with lowered speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Overall, I am in support of this, but please look at changing the speed limit along Campbell Ave. to 25 MPH. People fly down our street at high rates of speed and this is an entirely residential street and should be 25 MPH for the safety of the residents, including children and elderly citizens, that live here.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
For the Transportation subcommittee meeting on October 18, take Agenda Item 2 off the consent agenda and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please remove Agenda Item 2 off the consent agenda and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please remove Agenda Item 2 off the consent agenda and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
For the Transportation subcommittee meeting on October 18, take Agenda Item 2 off the consent agenda and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits
Take Agenda Item 2 off the consent agenda and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law.
This agenda Item should not be on the consent agenda since it is lacking a study that is not included on the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. This agenda item should be removed and/or voted NO on.
The study this agenda item references is missing from the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law as our council should be provided all information to vote and that we the people are able to discern the information to determine if this is good for us the taxpayers.
Remove this item from the agenda and cast a 'no' vote. The Phoenix team say there's supporting study for proposed speed limit reductions, but this study is absent from the agenda documentation, constituting a breach of open meeting regulations. Item 2 exhibits a lack of fairness as it disproportionately affects the most disadvantaged communities. Those in less fortunate circumstances will face financial burdens due to the inevitable fines associated with lowered speed limits.
No study supporting this is included. Speed limit changes are moot, as there are not police to enforce them already.
Table this item. Maricopa County just voted in their last public meeting to increase speed limits. When you originally proposed Vision Zero, you promised it would not be used to reduce speed limits. In fact, you mocked those who said reducing speed limits would happen from this failed program. Reducing speed limits increases traffic congestion and carbon emissions from the idling of cars.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits
Remove this item from the agenda and cast a 'no' vote. The Phoenix team say there's supporting study for proposed speed limit reductions, but this study is absent from the agenda documentation, constituting a breach of open meeting regulations. Item 2 exhibits a lack of fairness as it disproportionately affects the most disadvantaged communities. Those in less fortunate circumstances will face financial burdens due to the inevitable fines associated with lowered speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
As a Arizona resident I highly oppose this agenda item. NO SPEED CAMERAS.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Overall, I am in support of this, but please look at changing the speed limit along Campbell Ave. to 25 MPH. People fly down our street at high rates of speed and this is an entirely residential street and should be 25 MPH for the safety of the residents, including children and elderly citizens, that live here.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
For the Transportation subcommittee meeting on October 18, take Agenda Item 2 off the consent agenda and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please remove Agenda Item 2 off the consent agenda and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please remove Agenda Item 2 off the consent agenda and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
For the Transportation subcommittee meeting on October 18, take Agenda Item 2 off the consent agenda and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits