Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda, and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda and vote NO! If the Phoenix staff has stated that there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, then why is the study not included in the agenda? This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. These communities are already at an economic disadvantage that can not afford tickets that will come with reduced speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda, and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda and vote NO! If the Phoenix staff has stated that there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, then why is the study not included in the agenda? This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. These communities are already at an economic disadvantage that can not afford tickets that will come with reduced speed limits.
Please take this agenda item off the consent agenda. and vote no. Phoenix staff has stated there is a study to back up the recommendations of reducing speed limits, but the study is not included in the agenda. This is a violation of open meeting law. Furthermore, Item 2 is inequitable because it impacts the most vulnerable communities the most. The least fortunate cannot afford the tickets that will come with reducing speed limits.